When designing a share option scheme, one of the most critical considerations is how to structure the vesting of options.
Vesting determines when employees earn the right to exercise their stock options, ensuring alignment between employee incentives and company goals.
Vesting is a mechanism that dictates how employees gain full ownership of their equity compensation over time or based on specific conditions. Rather than granting full benefits upfront, companies use vesting schedules to encourage long-term commitment and performance.
Choosing the right vesting structure depends on the company’s long-term strategy and growth trajectory. Here are the three most common approaches:
This is the most common vesting method, particularly for revenue-generating or cash-flow-positive companies. Employees earn their share options gradually over a set period, typically four to five years.
Example: A four-year vesting schedule with a one-year cliff means:
This structure incentivizes employees to contribute to the company’s long-term success and build shareholder value.
For startups targeting an acquisition or IPO, vesting on exit ensures employees are rewarded when the company reaches a liquidity event. In this scenario, options only vest upon a company sale or flotation. Employees then exercise their stock options, convert them into shares, and immediately sell them at a profit.
This model works well for early-stage startups investing in intellectual property (IP) rather than revenue generation.
Some companies tie vesting to specific performance milestones, such as reaching a revenue target or valuation. While this approach directly links employee stock options to business growth, it comes with challenges:
Due to these difficulties, performance-based vesting is less common and requires careful structuring.
A vesting cliff is the period before any options vest. For example, with a one-year cliff, employees must stay for a full year before receiving any vested shares. If they leave before this period, they forfeit their options.
An alternative approach is granting stock options only after an employee passes their probation period, simplifying administration and reducing legal costs.
In practice, most companies, particularly in the tech industry, tend to adopt one of two common vesting structures:
Some companies offer accelerated vesting, where share options vest faster under specific circumstances, such as an acquisition. This provides an extra incentive for employees during mergers or buyouts.
It’s essential to define what happens to unvested shares if an employee leaves. Good leaver and bad leaver provisions dictate whether employees retain any of their unvested stock options upon departure.
Employees should be aware of the tax impact of exercising stock options. In many countries, exercising options creates a taxable event, meaning employees could owe taxes on the difference between the option price and the market value of the shares.
For UK employees, the Enterprise Management Incentive (EMI) scheme helps minimize tax liabilities and maximize gains.
In conclusion, designing a share option vesting scheme requires careful consideration of the company’s long-term objectives, the desired employee behaviour, and potential tax and legal implications. By choosing the right vesting structure, companies can align their employees’ interests with their own growth and success, ensuring that both parties benefit from the company’s future achievements.
If you would like some help with implementing your stock options scheme, then please get in touch with via LinkedIn or through our website.
We use technology to do the heavy lifting, resulting in a Zen-like state for your finances, freeing up headspace to run your company.
Enter your email and we'll be in touch.